SB 279 and HB 6167: Understanding Proven Impacts

SB 279 and corresponding HB 6167 introduces changes that warrant opposition regarding their proven impacts on patient care and access to healthcare services. Here's how SB 279 and HB 6167 will affect healthcare:

Cost Impact

SB 279 and HB 6167 will increase out-of-pocket expenses for patients managed by non-physicians, adding up to $119 monthly. Inappropriate referrals will exacerbate costs, counteracting potential savings.

Referral Rates and Costs

Patients under non-physician care, like nurse practitioners (NPs), exhibit higher rates of specialist referrals and diagnostic imaging, driving up healthcare expenses.

Overprescribing Risks

NPs with independent prescription authority, as proposed in SB 279 and HB 6167, heighten the risk of opioid overprescribing, raising concerns for patient safety.

Quality of Care Concerns

Studies indicate higher patient satisfaction with physicians, and physician-led teams show better outcomes, particularly for complex cases. Independent NP care raises safety concerns.

Access Challenges

Contrary to expectations, granting NPs full practice authority hasn't universally improved access, raising questions about its effectiveness in underserved areas.

HB 4472 Overview

• Introduced by State Rep. Alabas Farhat (D-Dearborn).
• Emphasizes physician-led, patient-centered care in underserved communities.
• Requires APRNs to practice within physician-led care teams.
• Aims to enhance healthcare access, patient safety, and quality of care.
• Fosters teamwork and communication for effective healthcare delivery.
• Reflects a commitment to prioritizing the well-being of Michigan patients.